Diagnosis
Subsequent processes operating directly or indirectly on remunerationSyst-msgv2 have caused the corresponding settlement scheduleSyst-msgv1 to render incorrect remuneration scheduling. this may havethe following consequences:

• During reversal of a commission document (resetting the relevant
commission case), one of the remuneration lines to be reversed has acorrection relationship with the current remuneration. Since thecorrection relationship is removed on reversal, the settlement schedulenow has an invalid status for the previously corrected remuneration. Thesettlement schedule is created again according to the rule used beforethe correction.

• During settlement rescheduling, the system detects that there is no
longer an agreement for settlement scheduling on the effective validitydate of the changed business object characteristics. There isconsequently no contractual agreement for remuneration scheduling. Thesettlement schedule is created again without any rules. Under thesecircumstances the whole entitlement is scheduled for one fixed date.

System Response
Settlement schedule &SYST-MSGV1& for remuneration &SYST-MSGV2& wascreated according to rule '&SYST-MSGV3&'.